Posted on 08/14/2008 5:24:18 AM PDT by thackney
I hope he fails miserably in getting Tax Payer money for those projects.
“build the vast array of new transmission lines required to get the electricity where it’s needed. “
He needs to figure out Tesla’s system for energy distribution. Sending energy through the earth. Ya just go down to your basement, drive a stake into the ground, and hook your house up to the stake! :)
I don’t trust T-bone as far as I can throw him!
When I hear T. Boob on the radio, I immediately think that Al Gore wrote his script.
T. Boob is trying to sell out America; financed, of course, by America.
yet, my husband said he’d heard that Pickens will not permit the windmills on HIS property, bc they are ugly. has anyone else heard this?
The writer claims that ".... he is just one among many who have tried to convince the public and policymakers that there is a connection between wind-generated electricity and oil, which is hardly used for electricity."
Turns out that "oil" is frequently used for "electricity" ~ mostly in "standby" generators that kick in when electric demand exceeds the capacity of base load systems (hydro, coalfired and nuclear power plants).
Oil is also used to power diesel engines on locomotives. Not a big deal I suppose but we can replace "diesel" with electricity on many thousands of miles of rail line.
BTW, that's without thinking about the problem very much ~ and it looks like the writer didn't think about it at all.
Oil is primarily used in transportation, manifest as gasoline and diesel fuel, but it's also used to heat homes in the Northeast. There are a myriad of electrically powered systems available to replace the oil fired furnaces for a quarter of the homes in this country.
Modern technology makes electricity "fungible" and readily substituted for oil in many applications.
And what do you think will be kicking in when the wind isn't blowing?
I hope he fails miserably in getting Tax Payer money for those projects.
San Fran Nan is one of his investors. Think about it.
We experimented with natural gas vehicles a few years back. In order to have any range at all, you have to have extreme pressures in the tank. Even with the highly pressurized tanks, you are looking at a 100-120 mile range, which is unacceptable for most folks.
We had a slow-fill system at our site, and would refill the vehicles overnight. For some applications, such as parts running and maintenance, the vehicles worked fairly well. But I would not want to deal with that for a daily driver.
The fact that the Congressional hogs are putting up their own money to eat from this trough makes me think that the fix is probably in. We need to be rational about energy policy. This program looks like just one more way for private individuals to enrich themselves from the treasury.
It would be cheaper and less damaging to our economy to just ask these people how much it would take them to go away and cut them a check.
TURBANS |
with the |
TURBINES |
![]() |
![]() |
I’m having a hard time understanding something......the environmentalists don’t have a problem with gigantic windmills lined up from Texas to N. Dakota, but they fight to stop oil wells from being built in ANWR, which is in the middle of nowhere, where no one ever goes, or ever will?
You set a water powered turbine between the two lakes. You can run it quite effectively at a consant rate.
We have an operation like that in Virginia for use with an atomic power plant. The plant runs at a constant rate. The lake is used to adjust load so that the atomic power plant does not need to be "adjusted" ~ (SEE: Chernobyl).
Recent announcements concerning breakthroughs in large scale battery systems indicate that the problem of storing electricity for use in high demand situations is not insurmountable.
Remember, just because something isn't there today doesn't mean it can't be there tomorrow.
So he’s a crook. Doesn’t mean he’s not got a good idea. Without a lot of folks like T. Boone Pickens you’d be shoveling horse manure off the street out front everyday, like it or not.
They fought redundancy to a standstill and suffered on account of it.
I like redundancy! We have underground wiring in this area ~ two sets of it in fact. Wires are good!
Ever been out to the Texas Panhandle? There isn't enough elevation gain for that to be practical.
We've got coal out the wazoo. Natural gas. Oil Shale. And we're finding more oil all the time. We don't need to have massive subsidies for wind power that is intermittent.
Of course, they are right, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't go after underground minerals.
Pure BS!!
It looks pretty level, but it's not as flat as Illinois and they are already well into building some pretty massive windfarms.
Fortunately electric wires work. So you can "ship the potential" somewhere else to run the pumps to move the water.
Less than 3% of the electricity generated in this country is via oil. Much of that is in remote locations such as small Alaskan villages. Conventional coal-fired plants will also burn some oil when starting up a 'cold' boiler because you have to get the temperature up before you begin feeding coal into the burners. But overall, nothing in Pickens' plan would change the amount of oil we use to generate electricity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.