But you have not demonstrated the relevance of that issue.
Sure have. In asking the question about where origins leaves off and 'evolution' begins, I highlight the evolutionists refusal to answer the question. They refuse because they know that once an answer is given, there is no logical, intermediate defensible position that would distinguish it from biblical creation.
The ToE commits the fallacy of exclusion by avoiding origins. Origins should be included in evolution because by claiming that origins is off-limits, science gets to avoid saying where the 'poof-zap' magic of space aliens/time-warping humans ended and 'evolution' began.
Evolutionists avoid that distinction like the plague because, once admitted, there is no logical, intermediate defensible position that would distinguish it from biblical creation.
Unfortunately, that would expose the fact that 'evolution' is nothing more than adaptation, the starting point for life is way down the imaginary path and 'evolution' is falsified as a model.