After reading much of what passes for “creation science”, I for one have concluded that the science part of that term is insanely lacking.
I do believe in God and he is the creator of all, however the “science” put forth as “creation science” that I have read wouldn’t pass any sort of peer review.
Evolution says things change over time, based on a host of variables. It does not say God doesn’t exist. In fact by first mover theory, all change is proof of God’s existence.
Certainly there are athiests who have latched onto evolution as an attempt to claim their is no God, but that has absolutely nothing to do with the actual theory of evolution at all. Just as there are those who completely deny it in defense of God. I find both of these groups fools myself.
When you say creation science wouldn’t pass a “peer review,” I find myself asking, what peers? It would depend, wouldn’t it.
We either take God at His word or we don’t. That’s how I see it.
“The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork. Day unto day utters speech, and night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor language where their voice is not heard.” Psalm 19:1-2.
The Bible reminds us frequently that God made the world and everything in it, and his very creation reveals it constantly.
It takes an incredible leap of atheistic faith to look at the human eyeball, the continually burning and perfectly suspended sun, or the water cycle, and deny their perfect design by a perfect Designer.