Apparently the evolutionist can never talk about evolution without importing religion into their conversation. It keeps the focus off the the belief of evolution and all of its scientific weaknesses.
Good afternoon, *___*
“Apparently the evolutionist can never talk about evolution without importing ‘THEIR’ religion into their conversation.”
there, fixed it.
LOL
regards
yes sir,
they do have millions of weaknesses - life today upon this earth as we know it *___*
Let me share some thoughts with you:
(from the first 2 pages in my phamplet on “Why Evolution CANNOT be true” copyright 2006)
If evolution was true, there would be BILLIONS of “in between” animals on the earth NOW -— like half dinosaur and half bird, using evo’s ideas.
Actually, there would have to be ALL percentages of “in between” species alive today, not just 50/50 but 1/99, 2/98, 3/97 -— 96/4, 97/3, 98/2, 99/1 etc, for ALL of the EVOLVED species, which of course according to the evos, is EVERYTHING and EVERYONE *___*.
WHERE are they ????
There are NONE to be found -— that’s not possible if evolution is true.
PLUS, we should see new animals “evolving/emerging” from the sea every day —— DO WE see any -— NOPE, NADA, NONE -— that is IMPOSSIBLE, of course, that is, if evolution were true.
Obviously, by just this simple observation alone, EVOLUTION is NOT true.
Now, some simple trivia:
There are at least 2,000,000 (two million) distinct species of animals in the world, and maybe as many as 5,000,000 (five million) or more – at least 1.8 million have been named.
Over 9,000 distinct bird species
Over 4,000 distinct mammal species
Out of the over 4000 mammals, there are only 2 (two) monotremes living today; a small spiny anteater called an Echidna and the Duck-Billed Platypus.
(btw, I like that the platypus causes the evo’s some heartache, cause per evolution, that means that the beaver and the duck are close cousins. LOL )
Explaining the origin of Australia’s marsupial population, and especially its uniqueness to that one isolated southern continent, is EXTREMELY difficult for evolutionists, unless they lie, (which of course they DO).
Approx 70% of the worlds’ marsupials are found in and around Austrailia -— per evolution, this is not possible. Also, Australia has only a tiny percentage of placental mammals, and of course the only monotremes.
For the numbers to be fair in evolutionary terms, there should be an even number of placenta, marsupial and monotreme mammals -— why aren’t there?
Why are there only about 3 or 4 mammals that cannot produce it’s own Vitamin C ??
Why is the giraffe the only large animal that has a unique gait? -— i.e. when walking, it picks up both legs on one side of his body
Why only one kind of mammal that can fly?
Where are the half-bats ?
Why only one kind of bird that can fly backwards and hover? And why is it, that ALL of the over 300 species of these birds only live in the Americas. How is that possible?
Why can’t all birds fly? What good are their wings (in an evolutionary aspect) if they can’t fly? Why haven’t ‘they’ de-evolved their wings (i.e. got rid of them) ?
Does anyone really believe that the ostrich, at one time, could fly ??
Or the elephant bird ??
Or that the penguin could fly ??
Speaking of mammals, from the evolutionist’s viewpoint, what good are the teats on a boar hog ??? Hmmmmmm
so Valkyryl,
what do you think *___*
have a good afternoon.
regards