==If it weren’t for creationist attempts to use government to tilt the playing field in their favor, we wouldn’t even be having these discussions.
Actually, I think Creation and ID scientists would be perfectly happy just removing the government from the equation all together. A sort of separation of government and science. Would this be ok with most Darwinists???
I can't speak for other "Darwinists," but I'd want to know what you think "removing the government from the equation" means in practice.
Actually, I can quite honestly say that I know of no area where evolutionists are “winning” the scientific debate, except in so far as they hide behind the force of government.
For there to even be a scientific debate, the anti-evolutionists would have to have a testable hypothesis beyond "someone did something sometime" and positive evidence for it. Unfortunately, they seem to prefer using the force of government and propaganda to give the illusion of a scientific debate.
It never is!
Please read back on these posts. You will see that the Darwinists are firm and steadfast defenders of police enforced government K-12 schools, government colleges and universities.
It is a matter of force. They need the government to force their will on other people's children. They want the government to **force** the taxpayer to pay for it.
Creationists and IDers call for separation of science ( and schools) and the state. I call that freedom.
The Darwinists call for state police power of the minds of other people's children. What bullies! I call that oppression!
By the way,...Just so no Darwinist here thinks I crawled out from under a rock, I personally subscribe ( mostly with some reservations) to the Theory of Evolution.