Let's just say its a relevant issue - given that (quite arguably ;>) YOU are trying to persuade the "wacky RIGHT" to vote for YOUR candidate, on the basis that YOU say he/she/it can WIN the election.
Numbers count, sport. If not, why do you need my vote?
(FYI, I just think ours are medicated for the past 8 years)
(LOL! There's a winning argument, if I ever saw one! 'Vote the way I suggest, because I think you've received more 'medication' over the last 8 years than the Stalinists!' How about if you kiss my 'small-r' republican @ss? ;>)
Because what you, calcowgirl and others have correctly pointed out remains...the democratic party voter has the opportunity to not choose Barack Obama, vote McCain... and still feel like his issues will be addressed maturely.
And what you have NEVER addressed remains as well - every elected official (or nominated candidate) is a servant of the people, not vice versa. To paraphrase William Rawle (http://www.constitution.org/wr/rawle_32.htm), 'to deny that fact would be inconsistent with the principle on which all our political systems are founded, which is, that the people have in all cases, a right to determine how they will be governed.' Mr. McCaine works for us - we do NOT work, and NEVER will work, for him. Period.
Voters are going to stampede away from Obama
Let's hope so. With folks like you promoting Mr. McCaine, using arguments such as you employ ("ours are medicated for the past 8 years"), I'm not so sure...
WIJG:Let's just say its a relevant issue - given that (quite arguably ;>) YOU are trying to persuade the "wacky RIGHT" to vote for YOUR candidate, on the basis that YOU say he/she/it can WIN the election. Numbers count, sport. If not, why do you need my vote?
What in the heck are you talking about? And why the caps? The shouting? Chill. My question was that it wasn't germane to the discussion who had more wackys....us or them.
Furthermore, if you've followed the thread conversation, I've made it clear...when it comes to seeing Obama lose...I'm thrilled to see a strategy that will counter the 'lost' conservative vote and make it a non-factor.
McCain choosing Lieberman is marketing and politcal genius, IMO. Whoever thought of that is the new Atwater. The new star.
There sure won't be any Florida recount....that's for sure. And Connecticut goes red.
You'll see...the abstainers won't hurt McCain. Maybe some of the other close races some like myself, forget about.
But as was pointed out to me the unhappy conservative will be courted in 2010 once again. So we can all hug again.
FYI, the 8 year medication comment was that our wackys were sedated by the fact Clinton isn’t in the WhiteHouse. At that time, I was a wacky too.
I think you have not only a comprehension problem, but also a big chip on your shoulder.
Our conversation is through until you lose the attitude and the superiority complex. I’ve been nothing but polite to you.
You already apologized once earlier.
It appears drinking and FReeping don’t mix.
Good evening.