[DCPatriot]

It's a big deal, pilgrim. Supporting comprehensive immigration reform doesn't make you a strong conservative. It goes against every conservative principle I know of.

So? Get over it. My fat FICON a$$ is as wide as your fat SOCON a$$.

Reagan signed off on the IRCA of 1986 and lived to regret it. Thanks to Ted Kennedy and the Dems, that legislation was gutted. Instead of a secure border, serious employer sanctions and stiff penalties for foreigners who come here illegally. We have 20 million law breakers to deal with.

Like I said....secure the borders and it shouldn't happen again.

Lieberman as McCain's Veep is a wrongheaded decision that will not garner him more votes. It will lose him millions of conservative votes.

And it will secure millions of conservative, moderate and INDY votes....given the opponent.

[Reagan Man]

So you admit to being a liberal. LOL

>>>>>Like I said....secure the borders and it shouldn't happen again.

Reagan would agree. Once is enough. NO AMNESTY!

>>>>> ... it will secure millions of conservative, moderate and INDY votes....given the opponent.

With a liberal like Lieberman, Giuliani or Romney as McCain's running mate, say hello to President Obama.

[calcowgirl]

My fat FICON a$$ is as wide as your fat SOCON a$$.

So much for reasonable people on this thread.

BTW, there is *nothing* fiscally conservative about promoting a $2 trillion dollar amnesty program and expecting taxpayers not to revolt. Promoting slavery would bring on about the same reaction.

[Lieberman as McCain's Veep]... will secure millions of conservative, moderate and INDY votes....given the opponent.

I think this is really wrong headed. Given McCain's age, the veep choice is more important this year than in other elections. People want a veep that would be able to take over in the case of McCain's unfortunate demise. Placing a Liberal on the ticket as President-in-Waiting is NOT going to attract conservatives and moderates.