Sure, and when my neighbor the State Trooper puts on his bulletproof vest, that means he’s threatening me.==
If you both has long barrel rifles then you both in balance. But when one of you guys buy new bullet prove vest means you are unbalanced now. Other side needs to balance it back again. So may be other side should buy the new rifle with special bullets to punch holes in bullet prove?
Ivan, when did the U.S. ever oppose Russia building the exact same missile shield?
America’s position is that every country in range of Iran should have one of these shedls, including Russia. Russia’s position is that Russia is only safe if Poland and the Czech Republic can be hit by Iranian missiles. Does that position make sense?
Sure, and when my neighbor the State Trooper puts on his bulletproof vest, that means he’s threatening me.==
“If you both has long barrel rifles then you both in balance. But when one of you guys buy new bullet prove vest means you are unbalanced now. Other side needs to balance it back again. So may be other side should buy the new rifle with special bullets to punch holes in bullet prove?”
Seems like you’re not having a hard time picking sides. The Cold War was just started again. You pick Russia-Iran-China. Fine now we know where you stand.
The anti-missile system proposed may be good enough to shoot down a one-missile attack, or maybe take out most of a half-dozen-missile attack. It would not do squat against a massive Russian attack
Or are you saying that the Russian ICBMs are so badly maintained that it's likely only one or two would actually launch?