Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FFranco; stuartcr

I think we can agree that ultimately spending is to blame and that the lowering of such is what is desired.


17 posted on 08/06/2008 10:19:28 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: djsherin

True, but we probably can also agree that it just never happens enough to make a difference. Usually, the only spending any party wants to cut, is the other party’s spending.


18 posted on 08/06/2008 10:22:02 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: djsherin; stuartcr

The theory is that if taxes are lowered, then spending will go down so expenses meet revenues. Therefore, according to this theory taxes should be cut first.

Part of President Bush’s greatness is that he is the first president in the history of America (maybe the world) to lower taxes in time of war. Unfortunately, the Democrats (and some Republicans) in Congress refused to reduce spending, which has resulted in increases in budget deficits and a larger national debt (though as a percent of GDP, the national debt is fairly small, but growing).


26 posted on 08/06/2008 11:24:23 AM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson