Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Threatens To Shut Straits of Hormuz
nysun.com ^ | August 4, 2008 | Eli Lake

Posted on 08/04/2008 1:41:18 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON—Two days after a diplomatic deadline has passed for Iran to enter negotiations with the world's great powers and end the reprocessing and enrichment of uranium, the chief of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps is threatening to close down one of the world's most critical oil chokepoints, the Straits of Hormuz.

Speaking to Iranian reporters after testing a new anti-ship missile, Mohammad Ali Jafari said it could sink "enemy ships" at a range of more than 200 miles, and that shutting down the Straits of Hormuz would be easy.

"Enemies know that we are easily able to block the Straits of Hormuz for unlimited period," Iran's official news service quoted Mr. Jafari as saying.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: baghdadbob; energy; energyprices; geopolitics; hormuz; iran; islam; maritime; middleeast; mohammedanism; oil; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Red Badger

“Is there some silly reason why a canal cannot be dug here?”
............
PLUS as an added bonus,
they could use all the sand from digging the canal
to build some more of those silly palm tree shaped islands!


61 posted on 08/04/2008 2:59:55 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Blockading countries is an act of war.


62 posted on 08/04/2008 3:05:45 PM PDT by Dagny&Hank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
It's supposed to be international waters, and if it takes the USN and the USAF combined to make it so, then so be it, but that's the way it should be.

My major complaint is that we provide the service for free to the rest of the world, while it costs us a good chunk of our GDP. I'd rather see the US drill and build nuke plants until we were self sufficient. And then when the world needed us to smack somebody down, demand payment, cash, up front, before we lifted a finger

63 posted on 08/04/2008 3:05:53 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

64 posted on 08/04/2008 3:08:20 PM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
BTW, Nancy... This is why we have a Strategic Petroleum Reserve... It's strategic!

Madam Pelosi says that you will have to explain that in simpler terms. Her vast storehouse of knowledge on the development of high tech squirrel wheel generators, and her well proven expertise in the field of converting recycled Bud Light bottle caps into hydrogen doesn't cover strategic oil reserve issues.

And anyway, according to what her Sierra Club advisors tell her even if we started drilling in her CA district today it would take 957 years for that oil to affect prices at the gas pump.

65 posted on 08/04/2008 3:08:39 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
What is the cost of the Democrat "No Domestic Energy Policy?"

All of that puts the U.S. in a position that war for oil or
complete economic collapse will be our only choices.
You can't frustrate every source of domestic energy
without consequences. Our enemies will blackmail us
to the extent that we are vulnerable to blackmail.

The Democrats are leading us into a real war for oil.
A war we won't have the energy to fight.

66 posted on 08/04/2008 3:10:01 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin '36 ... Olympics for murdering regimes. ... Beijing '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

And whose ships will they hit to block it. Neighboring countries or US Navy?


67 posted on 08/04/2008 3:11:13 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Well put.


68 posted on 08/04/2008 3:17:23 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
I'd rather see the US drill and build nuke plants until we were self sufficient.

Well, I'm all in favor of that, but we're talking about the Iranians shutting down the spigot in the near future.

We certainly cannot drill our way out of THAT, it will take time to get horses' asses in Washington pointed the right direction, and it will take time to drill, and it will take time to build production/refinery capacity.

We can't be without oil for all that time.

69 posted on 08/04/2008 3:18:31 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kabar
They don’t have the military capability to shut down the strait for any significant amount of time.

That's what I thought until I was recently told on another thread that the Iranians could block the navigable channels through the Hormuz straits just by sinking a few tankers with their conventional warhead missiles, and it would take a year of more to clear the blockage. I know practically nothing about that area, but apparently those shipping channels through the Hormuz Straits are very narrow and easy to close off.

70 posted on 08/04/2008 3:19:47 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

xlnt


71 posted on 08/04/2008 3:21:46 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: epow
That's what I thought until I was recently told on another thread that the Iranians could block the navigable channels through the Hormuz straits just by sinking a few tankers

At the most narrow point of the Hormuz strait, it is 21 miles wide. It would take more than a "few" tankers. Most of the strait is rather deep.

72 posted on 08/04/2008 3:35:07 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

73 posted on 08/04/2008 3:35:45 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bein ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
I can't imagine a "few tankers" blocking any strait for any appreciable amount of time.

--At its narrowest point, the Strait is only 34 miles (55 km) across.

--The Strait consists of 2-mile (3.2-km) wide navigable channels for inbound and outbound tanker traffic as well as a 2-mile-wide buffer zone.

--The entire strait is only 180 kilometers long, and at its narrowest points only about 45 kilometers wide. It contains two shipping lanes used for large vessels. The channels are each 3.2 kilometers wide, with a 3.2-kilometer buffer zone between them. The northern channel is within only a few dozen kilometers of the Iranian coast.

Here is scholarly article on assessing the threat to the Strait of Hormuz It estimates that an Iranian mine laying attack could close the strait for up to a month.

74 posted on 08/04/2008 3:36:58 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Enemies know that we are easily able to block the Straits of Hormuz for unlimited period,"
This really shows how ignorant these people are. SO, he has a missle that can hit a ship--- what? , a couple hundred miles away ? The USA is " Hitting planets,, millions of miles away within yards of their intended targets!!! Wake up bozo,, you got nothin.
75 posted on 08/04/2008 4:01:44 PM PDT by vinylsidingman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dagny&Hank

So is attacking commercial shipping in international waters.


76 posted on 08/04/2008 4:07:30 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
For "unlimited period" read "15 minute flight time of a multiple D-5 warhead missile from a Trident nuclear submarine...

These idiots think we are toothless and they are untouchable. We are tigers and they are entirely mortal. It is high time someone taught them that fact.

77 posted on 08/04/2008 4:32:24 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Everyone assumes we will voluntarily neuter ourselves. One of these days the world's idiots are going to push just a little too far just one time too many, and wake up in hellfire.
78 posted on 08/04/2008 4:34:38 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mpackard
I will.

And God bless you and your daughter and keep her safe.

Thank you both.

79 posted on 08/04/2008 5:00:26 PM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel. "Uh...she is!" Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
We have enough assets in the area to take care of the
problem; Carriers, Cruisers, subs, etc.
80 posted on 08/04/2008 5:05:05 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson