Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande
...repeating the same thing...definition of insanity?

If that's the case, its time you looked in the mirror. Over and over again you've brought up the same argument. The subject: Why don't those who agreed with Judge Walthers decision to remove the children from the FLDS environment now insist on the courts taking the same action since some of the FLDS men have been indicted?

You have repeated the same question in a number of your posts. If no one answered your question, too bad. Nevertheless, you persist in repeating yourself ad nauseam.

Do you exempt yourself from your definition of insanity?

Now knowing the mindset of the Texas SC, Judge Walthers shows common sense by patiently awaiting further action against the FLDS. That's not to say she made a wrong decision.

I hope that answers your repetitious (insane?) question.

I'm sorry to say that I think your intention is mainly to agitate, while you choose to completely ignore every bit of evidence that shows the FLDS as a criminal cult.

Please don't post to me again. You've had my last response.

182 posted on 08/03/2008 12:04:43 AM PDT by IIntense (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: IIntense
If that's the case, its time you looked in the mirror. Over and over again you've brought up the same argument. The subject: Why don't those who agreed with Judge Walthers decision to remove the children from the FLDS environment now insist on the courts taking the same action since some of the FLDS men have been indicted?

If you supported the CPS's removal of women and children when they had no evidence, it is very telling that you don't support it now that they have evidence.

You have repeated the same question in a number of your posts. If no one answered your question, too bad. Nevertheless, you persist in repeating yourself ad nauseam.

Do you exempt yourself from your definition of insanity?

No, I am not expecting different results. It is the second part of the statement that determines the mental condition. You apparently aren't able to comprehend the second part of the statement, but that is OK. I recognize that you have a mental disorder and I am doing my best to help you.

I hope that answers your repetitious (insane?) question.

Were you expecting a different answer or the same answer?

I'm sorry to say that I think your intention is mainly to agitate, while you choose to completely ignore every bit of evidence that shows the FLDS as a criminal cult.

What does that have to do with the CPS's criminal behavior? I recognize that most criminals are criminals. I tend to get upset when police break the law, I expect it from the criminals. Why is that point so hard to understand?

Please don't post to me again. You've had my last response.

Fine with me. I don't want you posting to me either. I prefer that you shut up and go away. It makes my job much easier : )

185 posted on 08/03/2008 7:07:34 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson