Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande
Now you are pretending you agreed with the rest of us...

Sigh. Another false statement. I disagreed with the decisions of the Appeals Court and the Texas Supreme Court, yet at least they acknowledged that Judge Waltham had the right to authorize requirements before releasing the children to their parent(s).

I really wonder how many (or few) articles you've taken the time to read about this cult. If, by chance, you belong to the FLDS, I assure you, you are being tragically mislead...duped.

The testimonies on the internet, by those who had the courage and good sense to get out, are countless. Those people, even some in their teens, had the common sense and courage to reject this perverted lifestyle.

You describe those who don't share your opinion as a cabal? Are you aware that you have a penchant for using hyperbole to try to prove your point? It doesn't work!

166 posted on 08/02/2008 1:01:26 AM PDT by IIntense (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: IIntense
Sigh. Another false statement. I disagreed with the decisions of the Appeals Court and the Texas Supreme Court, yet at least they acknowledged that Judge Waltham had the right to authorize requirements before releasing the children to their parent(s).

If you disagreed with the Supreme Court why aren't you clamoring for CPS to come in and take the women and children now? They actually have evidence and charges, aren't you being inconsistent by not demanding that the CPS come back in and snatch them?

170 posted on 08/02/2008 6:58:51 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson