Posted on 07/29/2008 6:44:21 AM PDT by ricks_place
That wasn't what you said at all. I am beginning to think that you have some kind of mental disorder. I probably shouldn't point out errors anymore.
If that's the case, its time you looked in the mirror. Over and over again you've brought up the same argument. The subject: Why don't those who agreed with Judge Walthers decision to remove the children from the FLDS environment now insist on the courts taking the same action since some of the FLDS men have been indicted?
You have repeated the same question in a number of your posts. If no one answered your question, too bad. Nevertheless, you persist in repeating yourself ad nauseam.
Do you exempt yourself from your definition of insanity?
Now knowing the mindset of the Texas SC, Judge Walthers shows common sense by patiently awaiting further action against the FLDS. That's not to say she made a wrong decision.
I hope that answers your repetitious (insane?) question.
I'm sorry to say that I think your intention is mainly to agitate, while you choose to completely ignore every bit of evidence that shows the FLDS as a criminal cult.
Please don't post to me again. You've had my last response.
Re-read post #83 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2053078/posts?page=83#83
From reading your comments to others, you seem to have problems with reading comprehension. As I said, you call others what you are and accuse them of doing what you do.
The term you are looking for is 'projection'. It is your problem not mine : )
If you supported the CPS's removal of women and children when they had no evidence, it is very telling that you don't support it now that they have evidence.
You have repeated the same question in a number of your posts. If no one answered your question, too bad. Nevertheless, you persist in repeating yourself ad nauseam.
Do you exempt yourself from your definition of insanity?
No, I am not expecting different results. It is the second part of the statement that determines the mental condition. You apparently aren't able to comprehend the second part of the statement, but that is OK. I recognize that you have a mental disorder and I am doing my best to help you.
I hope that answers your repetitious (insane?) question.
Were you expecting a different answer or the same answer?
I'm sorry to say that I think your intention is mainly to agitate, while you choose to completely ignore every bit of evidence that shows the FLDS as a criminal cult.
What does that have to do with the CPS's criminal behavior? I recognize that most criminals are criminals. I tend to get upset when police break the law, I expect it from the criminals. Why is that point so hard to understand?
Please don't post to me again. You've had my last response.
Fine with me. I don't want you posting to me either. I prefer that you shut up and go away. It makes my job much easier : )
Yes, I’ve used the term on these threads. I was trying to use simpler words for you.
Did you re-read post #83, again?
You should write what you mean. If you didn't mean what you wrote that is OK we all make mistakes. Some of us are big enough to admit it though.
Good, I’ll be expecting your admission that you misinterpreted what I said in post #83.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.