Is this you mentioned over at texasdarlin’s blog?
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/1521/#comment-5921
Apparently so, but the post is only about one quarter right. I did look at the images in word to look at the metadata, which showed they were photoshop files. However, it was pointed out at the time that this is not very probative since (a) many scanners default into photoshop when the image is scanned and (b) the guy on Kos said from the git-go that he had cropped the image, which would leave that metadata. Also, I did not definitively say they were forgeries, as I was concerned it was a trap. Others much more well versed in imaging software made that argument. I’m just a bystander on this one.