Top Astronaut: 'Aliens Do Exist' [Dr Edgar Mitchell who was the sixth man on the Moon......]

Sky News ^

[Sub-Driver]

Top Astronaut: 'Aliens Do Exist'

11:37am UK, Thursday July 24, 2008 Aliens do exist and have even contacted humans on Earth, according to top astronaut Dr Edgar Mitchell who was the sixth man on the Moon. l-alien

Dr Edgar Mitchell says aliens are just like little men

The truth has been hidden by governments for more than 60 years, the Moon walker says.

And he claims he is lifting the lid on a conspiracy to keep aliens a secret.

Dr Mitchell, who was on Apollo 14 in 1971, has told how he was aware of many UFO visits to Earth during his career with Nasa but each one was covered up.

The 77-year-old claims the space agency made contact with aliens, describing the beings as "little people who look strange to us".

[JoJo Gunn]

Let me qualify what I said of the scammers. They might very well be acting via realism, since if they don’t go along with the propaganda, their funding will be cut off.

[Quix]

Evidently either one is beyond your skill level

given the difficulty in knowing

the

DIFFERENCE

between

ASKING questions

vs

ANSWERING questions.

[Quix]

I really don’t recall anything that would conclusively convince me of any one of the above.

And, it seems more likely that more than one are true.

Whether more than one are true of all the critters or different classes of critters remains to be seen.

I certainly don’t believe the critters nor the humans so traitorously in cahoots with them.

[Quix]

BTW, you don’t have a clue about my rigorous scientific analysis any more than you seem to have a clue about UFO’s.

I was pleasantly surprised to be voted into Who’s Who by my PhD faculty and classmates.

[Quix]

I missed the Mitchell part. The other junk was on during my bladder breaks.

Anything new from the Mitchell segments?

[Quix]

It's also more than a little surprising

that there's still evidence of some sort of delusional assumption

that I have some level of motivation above -100% (quite below +100% for those in Rio Linda)

to provide even the time of day to some naysayers.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the recommendation, Rightwhale!

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.

[Quix]

There were some interesting exchanges before the usual naysayers’ sabotage efforts.

There could be more . . . some of us mutter along in betwixt.

[RightWhale]

Nothing new from Mitchell. He sounds good, sharp, just as impressed by quantum statistics as ever.

[RightWhale]

The Mitchell segment is in the last half hour of the Friday show.

[Quix]

Certainly the quantum stuff is interesting.

But I think it’s only hints . . . we are still flatlanders trying to pontificate about multi-dimensions? Riiiiiighhhht.

The New Agers are sooooo convinced that they have an accurate handle on everything.

God will have them in derision uproariously.

I’m glad Mitchell is still sounding sharp to you. He came across that way to me on the Larry King show as well. And, on the radio show.

Thanks for your kind comments.

[Quix]

Thanks.

I wish they published transcripts for one and all at C2C.

[ZX12R]

I really don’t recall anything that would conclusively convince me of any one of the above. And, it seems more likely that more than one are true.

Then I'll have to buy you one of Occam's razors for Christmas, because your research into the subject at hand, seems to be stuck at an ever broadening standstill.

[ZX12R]

I was pleasantly surprised to be voted into Who’s Who by my PhD faculty and classmates.

I have no trouble believing you were voted into a who's who compilation, and since you mentioned it. In what PHilosophy did you earn your Doctorate?

[Quix]

. . . ever broadening . . .

guilty as charged.

One of my friends—American—in Taipei learned to avoid asking me to edit my writings to condense them. They’d always end up ENLARGED.

Hey—I was a librarian for 6 years. I collect info and puzzle pieces like a pack rat!

I wait for clusters to appear!

Sometimes, I dink around clustering . . . but mostly I wait for clusters to appear.

I love massive amounts of info.

I collected over 1,000 . . . I think it was 1,004 or 1,024 or some such variables for my PhD dissertation and analyzed only 4 of them for the Dissertation. LOL.

I think Occams razor has some utility but is often over-rated.

Those options you listed are all well represented in the literature. And none of them, to my 47 years of study, have taken the lead.

That’s just the state of our information collection. I don’t think Occam’s razor is going to change that—reliably—in any respect.

From my Christian perspective, I’d say that the spiritual dimension HAS to be a big factor. Has to be.

Beyond that—it’s quite a muddled bunch of data.

Certainly the secularists will likely insist that inter-galactic, etc. are all involved. And they COULD BE.

I’d be surprised if there were NO inter-galactic etc. But it COULD all be a charade on that score. I just don’t think it 100% is a charade on that score.

my 2 cents.

[Quix]

Clinical Psychology

Only to discover along the way that I loathed the “professional phony” aspects of the profession.

I’m a poor white trash heritage country farm boy. I like the nitty gritty of daily life with the troops.

My clients and students virtually always acclaimed the God-given capacity to get inside their skin.

To then put on airs as some ostentatious pope of psychology was extremely offensive to me. I refused to play those professional games.

Consequently, I ended up teaching part or full time and counseling part time in agencies.

Then I didn’t have to play much of the professional political BS games.

I could have done things differently, probably. But I think that’s suited me best and I’m happy with it.

Thanks for your kind words.

[JoJo Gunn]

I’ve asked you where the pictures are, many times, and you haven’t answered that either. Where are they, laughing boy?

And YouTube is not a reliable source.

[JoJo Gunn]

BTW, you don’t have a clue about my rigorous scientific analysis any more than you seem to have a clue about UFO’s.

I was pleasantly surprised to be voted into Who’s Who by my PhD faculty and classmates.

Anybody can claim to be anything on the internet. Let's see some bona fides.  

[Quix]

It's also more than a little surprising

that there's still evidence of some sort of delusional assumption

that I have some level of motivation above -100% (quite below +100% for those in Rio Linda)

to provide even the time of day to some naysayers.