Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

I think it’s a credibility issue. I mean really, National Enquirer? You know a story like this is probably bogus when Drudge hasn’t even gotten anything on it.


32 posted on 07/24/2008 5:35:08 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Wrong.

http://www.drudgereport.com/

NATIONAL ENQUIRER CORNERS JOHN EDWARDS AT BEVERLY HILTON...

EDWARDS RESPONDS: ‘I don’t talk about these tabloids. Tabloid trash is full of lies.’ Developing...

Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards ‘Love Child’ Story...


35 posted on 07/24/2008 5:40:31 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

All I ask is that a reporter simply ask Edward’s if he was at the hotel at the time indicated in the NE story. Seems like a very basic question to ask. Instead he is asked if he feels what happened in Hollywood will affect his future political positions? This allows him to answer by criticizing NE only. Why are reporters so stupid these days?


50 posted on 07/24/2008 7:14:31 AM PDT by crymeariver (Good news...in a way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson