Posted on 07/24/2008 4:47:01 AM PDT by abb
That's exactly what it was. Get Nixon at any cost.
After all, Nixon convicted Alger Hiss, a no-no.
You don’t believe Edwards fathered a child out of wedlock? Ever hear of a paternity test?
If he isn’t the father, he has only to take a paternity test and prove beyond any doubt that the story is false. Then he can sue.
Now why would he not do that?
And furthermore, why would his friend who claimed to be the father of Hunter’s child, not take a paternity test to prove it and clear the name of his friend John Edwards? For Elizabeth’s sake too, if he could lift the suspicion so easily, prove his claim of fatherhood, why won’t he?
Good point, thanks
Noooo,
You don’t think this ambulance chaser would use his wifes illness for political gain now do ya?
I've dealt with them on a story. You'd be amazed what it takes for them to publish a story. If they say they had a reporter there, they did. And it wasn't a reporter, it was a team of reporters.
You may want to check out the update:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_love_child_update/celebrity/65199
CBS ‘Extra’ did a spot on this scandal, emphasizing the denials of course. They have a poll. It appears the dems are in their typical denial mode.
Tell Extra - do you believe there’s something going on between John and Rielle?
No way! He’d never do that to Elizabeth. 55%
Yes! The cute ones always cheat. 45%
http://extratv.warnerbros.com/
re: foot tapping
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.