there is something I would like to clear up about my comments here. I first introduced the Kenneth Lamb article to the long-running thread on the obama birth certificate thread:
Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh).LINK.
as a result of the questions raised as to what motives may have led to the document shown as a CoLB being tampered with, if in fact it was.
My hypotheses was simply that there was something on the original document that would have been harmful to the obama campaign. Kenneth Lamb's research pointed to an obvious major problem, if what he writes is correct.
The speculation on my part, that Obama Snr, with hubris, (he had a very high opinion of himself) may have completed the registration of birth application by describing himself as African-Arab, or Arab-African, something that was possibly a political statement in 1960 and would not have raised any eyebrows then, would be a disaster for a candidate who is running on a carefully constructed mythos of being the first African-American candidate.
It's a long stretch, but I still believe it's possible the word ARAB was removed from the document - and that's why his father's race is shown only as AFRICAN. 'African' is not a Race - and would hardly have been accepted as such by the Hawaii Health Department.
I have also, in a number of posts here, shown that the words AFRICAN-ARAB OR ARAB-AFRICAN are and were in common use.
*