Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Weigh it to make sure; you’ll find it is heavier than its two cycle predecessor. Also, you have to change its oil, something you don’t have to do with a two cycle weed eater.


9 posted on 07/19/2008 5:29:10 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: libstripper
"Also, you have to change its oil, something you don’t have to do with a two cycle weed eater."

Yeah, but you also have to maintain two different supplies of fuel---one with, and one without, admixed oil. No thanks---I'll stick with the four cycle, and my single tank of gas. And, in my experience, four-cycle engines hold up a lot better than two-cycle (I rebuilt a LOT of chain-saws engines in my "youth").

11 posted on 07/19/2008 5:34:02 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Horse power to weight ratio.... two cycle wins every time and it’s not even close. Cost... two cycle wins every time.Fuel consumption and dirty exhaust... four cycle wins.Ease of maintenance two cycle again. I would not have a four cycle chainsaw and as one who makes a sizeable portion of his living with one I know of what I speak.


15 posted on 07/19/2008 5:53:05 AM PDT by SAWTEX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson