Academia to high schools: No God allowed

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | July 19, 2008

[Man50D]

Arguments were heard today in a federal district court case to determine whether a state university system can dictate that private Christian schools in the state teach their college prep courses from exclusively secular, Bible- and God-free textbooks.

As WND reported earlier, the University of California system adopted a policy last year that basic science, history, and literature textbooks by major Christian book publishers wouldn't qualify for core admissions requirements because of the inclusion of Christian perspectives.

Robert Tyler, who is representing Calvary Chapel Christian School and five students in the case against the University of California, told WND that the university's discriminatory policy creates an ultimatum for Christian schools. "If you want courses to be approved in private education, so your students are qualified to attend (UC) institutions, you must teach from a secular point of view," he said.

"Christian schools will have to decide: teach from a Christian worldview and eliminate your student's ability to attend a UC school, or teach from a secular worldview, so that the kids can enter the UC school system," he explained.

"Essentially what's happening is the UC has to pre-approve courses taught in high school," Tyler said. "It's pretty shocking, because in depositions UC reps made it clear: whether it be English, history or science, the addition of a religious viewpoint makes it unacceptable."

Tyler also told WND that though a decision from Federal District Court Judge Otero is expected in the next two to three weeks, he fully expects the case to be appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and perhaps even the U.S. Supreme Court, since both sides are firmly entrenched and likely to appeal if Otero decides against them.

[Man50D]

Is the building cited above made of dust?

Isn't everything eventually pulverized into dust?

[Lucky Dog]

What the heck is a Christian science textbook---one that has the world beginning 6,000 years ago? That kind of crap went out with the Dark Ages, and for damned good reason.

Is the building cited above made of dust?

Isn't everything eventually pulverized into dust?

The purpose of this question to Rudder and others was not to point out that everything was made of dust.

Rather, it was point out that there are some things for which science has no answer. Similarly, there are some things for which science can, perhaps, tell what happens, but not why. Finally, there other things in which science and religion seem to be in conflict when it merely a conflict of semantics, not of substance.