Then you oppose the right of free association, the ability of a community to define the rules by which the members will live. That makes you a tyrant seeking to enforce a uniform amorality, simply because you do not understand the principle of federalism moderated by natural law competition among communities.
That’s nearly the complete opposite of what I believe. How on Earth is taking government OUT of the equation trampling on free association? How is wanting marriage not to be defined by government being a tyrant? How is allowing state to make their own laws violating the principle of federalism? You don’t have your head on straight at all.