Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steely Tom
I wouldn't trade places with a black man in 99% of the neighborhoods black men live in today.

Fair enough, but the point I was trying to make to the other poster is that if the 1950's were such a paradise, then it seems like it would be a good trade to live in that time, regardless of your racial background.

And those neighborhoods didn't get that way because of white guys from the suburbs.

I blame hippies. Up until the late 60's, all of the demographic indicators for blacks in America were on an upswing. But the whole "Turn on, tune in, drop out" liberal crap of the 60's was a disaster for the black community. Experimenting with drugs and free love and whatever is a lot easier when you have well-off parents to help pick up the pieces. For working-class blacks, there was no such safety net.

Yet one more thing to blame on liberals.

28 posted on 07/17/2008 11:21:01 AM PDT by Citizen Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Citizen Blade
Up until the late 60's, all of the demographic indicators for blacks in America were on an upswing.

I'd like some examples if you would. I've used the "TV shows don't reflect reality" argument with some, but I'd like to incorporate this argument into my discussions.

35 posted on 07/18/2008 7:19:06 AM PDT by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson