Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atomic conspiracy

“For example, note that the NYT characterizes the Afghan operation with the leftist weasel-word “intervention,”

What would the proper word be?


19 posted on 07/13/2008 3:57:00 PM PDT by vanishing liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: vanishing liberty

“What would the proper word be?”

“Operations,” “military action,” “war” even “invasion,” would all be accurate. “Intervention” is a loaded term implying that it was really someone else’s fight and we had no real warrant or direct cause to be there.

It is a weasel word though because one can ignore this connotation and point out that we did in fact intervene in the conflict between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. This would only be in the same sense that we “intervened” in the existing Sino-Japanese conflict after Pearl Harbor, however.


20 posted on 07/13/2008 4:06:20 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: vanishing liberty
What would the proper word be?

How about what it is - WOT.

We did not go to war on the Afghan people. You might call it a "Liberation"- how about that?

25 posted on 07/13/2008 8:30:40 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terrible agitated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson