Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Schnucki

The analysis of where we stand is correct, but the conclusion that the US negotiate with Iran doesn’t follow. Negotiate about what? The leaders of Iran are Islamofascist non-rational state actors.

Two ideas I have read:
1. US or Israel to completely destroy one facility, as an example to Iran of what will happen.
2. NATO or coalition to stop all refined gas imports to Iran, until they stop nuclear program.


3 posted on 07/10/2008 4:40:51 AM PDT by sandbox (Name the enemy// Win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sandbox

I’m not sure that the WW1 analogy holds only because the disparity of strength between the antagonists. Iran is way outmatched by almost any measure you care to use. I’m not saying that Iran couldn’t do some considerable damage. Rocketing US bases in Iraq; doing the same to Saudi oil fields, dropping a Shahab onto Tel Aviv; closing the Strait of Hormuz — all are real possibilities. I just don’t think that they could sustain the military effort for long.


9 posted on 07/10/2008 6:20:38 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson