[RonDog]

ANN COULTER: THE NEW YORK TIMES VS. HELMS, PART 529,876 (Free Republic Quoted)

LOL!

Sort of.

While some may think that your thread title falsely implies -- (perhaps to get more FReepers to click on this thread?) -- that Ann quoted FR **in her article** this week, in your defense I will note that the maximum length of a thread title on FR is only ninety-nine characters.

So, you probably just didn't have room to post what you REALLY wanted to:

ANN COULTER: THE NEW YORK TIMES VS. HELMS, PART 529,876 (Free Republic Quoted on Ann's website last week)

[Syncro]

Well, it was a false implication, but with a rationalization of merit (IMO)

Last week when I posted Ann's column, I clicked on

Free Republic fr

under the "topic" area as I usually do. Because Ann Coulter is a member of Free Republic, a dynamic supporter, and a friend of the Founder.

Plus she frequently mentions FR on her website.

A Mod (who shall go unnamed so I don't have to ping him/her :>) posted to me that the fr designation is for Free Republic Business only, and removed the "Topic" Free Republic.

And then later, Ms Coulter posted a Comment From Free Republic on her website. Therefore,qualifying the thread "Free Republic Business."

Not wanting to bother the Mod to ask for the topic Free Republic being reinstated, I put it in the title of this thread.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it...

:>)

Oh, and it's a double whammy, 'cause Ann has quoted the same poster on her Get Drunk And Vote Website from this thread of her column today!