[Non-Sequitur]

ID doesn't say who the designer is.

No, ID isn't even interested in who the designer is. Science, on the other hand, may not have identified what the source material was but that doesn't mean it throws it's hands up and stops looking.

BTW, The Big Bang was outside the natural laws of physics and was thus supernatural. (i.e., cosmic miracle)

There are a whole lot of physicists who would disagree with you on that.

[gscc]

“There are a whole lot of physicists who would disagree with you on that.”

But none that can prove it.

[Fichori]

"There are a whole lot of physicists who would disagree with you on that." [excerpt]

I really don't care how many physicists disagree with me, the evidence clearly disproves the Big Bang.


Missing antimatter challenges the 'big bang' theory
“Antimatter and the Big Bang”(An essay on one of the scientific problems with the Big Bang)


The whole idea that the Big Bang created matter from nothing all while operating within the natural laws of physics is totally absurd.

If the natural laws of physics did not exist before the Big Bang, then there is no way it can be called natural.

Either way, the Big Bang is supernatural because it either a: broke the natural laws of physics, or b: created the natural laws of physics.

I can sum it up very simply: Big Bang = Cosmic Boondoggle.