“The only thing the Discovery Institute has come up with to try and disprove evolution are some rhetorical shenanigans. IOW, a big pile of steaming B.S.”
How can you disprove something that has never been proved. Why don’t you concentrate on proving what so far have proven to be unprovable? Wouldn’t that actually be science?
Because science is incapable of proving something. It only tests theories for falsification. So far, evolution has not been falsified every time it has been tested. Most of the science stuff from the DI is so bad, one comes away less informed after reading it.