Skip to comments.
Dukakis calls for end to Electoral College
The Boston Herald ^
| July 8, 2008
| Dave Wedge
Posted on 07/08/2008 9:42:48 AM PDT by buccaneer81
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: buccaneer81
Hey Michael, Do Cakis?
81
posted on
07/08/2008 11:03:20 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Politics: The art of convincing the populace that your delusions are superior to others.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
"Under the current system, running for president means just one thing: focus on the so-called swing states," he wrote. "I did it. Al Gore did it. John Kerry did it, and our Republican opponents did it, too. A big turnout in Massachusetts and many other states is irrelevant to winning the election. Only winning the swing states matters."
IOW, "campaigning in Massachusetts isn't necessary for Demwit candidates, and that's as it should be."
82
posted on
07/08/2008 11:07:14 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: Always Right
To: buccaneer81
The overwhelming majority of the American people do [support getting rid of the electoral college], too. Got any respectable national poll results to back up that assertion, Mikey? Yeah, didn't think so.
84
posted on
07/08/2008 11:08:36 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: buccaneer81
Is Dukakis jumping the gun, or has the political indoctrination wing of the Democrat party (the NEA) made us sufficiently stupid to see merit in such an idea?
85
posted on
07/08/2008 11:21:03 AM PDT
by
VR-21
To: Michael.SF.
Mike Mondale? Yeah, I grabbed the wrong map ... spell check can't prevent me from making an idiot out of myself.
86
posted on
07/08/2008 11:41:50 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Privatizing profits and socializing losses is no way to run an economy)
To: buccaneer81
Imagine the chaos of an election when the popular vote difference is razor thin. Think of endless recounts, hanging chads, lawsuits etc. while the country is without a President. The Founding Fathers wanted to make the election of a President certain and created the Electoral College for that reason.
87
posted on
07/08/2008 11:46:17 AM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: buccaneer81
Democrats hate the Constitution.
88
posted on
07/08/2008 11:47:08 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Hey if a small tax increase didn't work, a bigger tax increase should not work even BETTER!)
To: buccaneer81
Right now, I only have to worry about my vote being cancelled by some dead guy in Newark or Camden. In a national popular vote, my vote could be cancelled by some dead guy in Chicago, as well!
89
posted on
07/08/2008 12:00:28 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons.)
To: buccaneer81
Right now, I only have to worry about my vote being cancelled by some dead guy in Newark or Camden. In a national popular vote, my vote could be cancelled by some dead guy in Chicago, as well!
90
posted on
07/08/2008 12:00:33 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons.)
To: savedbygrace
So, when there is a close election with a Republican winning the popular vote, we can count on the legislature and political powerbrokers in a die-hard liberal state, like Massachusetts, to go against the overwhelming will of their electorate and cast their votes for the Democrat.
Suuuuure you will.
Think about it for a minute. It would be a sure fire winner for them to abrogate any agreement between Election Day and the day of voting in the Electoral College. They would earn the everlasting gratitude of their voters, and there would be no political down-side at all. It's a no-brainer!
91
posted on
07/08/2008 12:05:32 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons.)
To: buccaneer81
Said Dukakis: "IF ONLY we had a popular vote in 1988, I'd....I'd.....well, i'd still have lost by about 10 million votes, give or take. never mind....."
Thank God our founders had the good sense to make it so difficult to change the Constitution. A Constitutional Amendment to ditch the Electoral college, ain't likely to happen.
92
posted on
07/08/2008 12:13:47 PM PDT
by
wbill
To: buccaneer81
Obama disagrees stating “Electricians are important to our ecomony, therefore I support them going to college”.
93
posted on
07/08/2008 12:29:21 PM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: buccaneer81
Under the current system, running for president means just one thing: focus on the so-called swing states, he wrote. I did it. Al Gore did it. John Kerry did it, and our Republican opponents did it, too. Well that was Gore's problem right there, he ought to have spent some time focusing on HIS OWN HOME STATE, winning Tennessee would have made that whole Florida fiasco non-existent:
Electoral votes needed to win: 270
Bush votes: 271 - 11 = 260
Gore votes: 267 + 11 = 278
To: fieldmarshaldj
post 43 ping
And thanks for the other thing.
To: buccaneer81
yes those stickers showed someone laughing their butt off;
same ones used for stickers/note pads saying “You want it
WHEN???”
To: MozarkDawg
He DID win his “home state” - Washington DC.
97
posted on
07/08/2008 12:48:00 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: raccoonradio
yes those stickers showed someone laughing their butt off; same ones used for stickers/note pads saying You want it WHEN???Mine was right next to the other one fron Ed King's era. It was a thumbs down with the slogan, "BARELY Making It In Massachusetts."
98
posted on
07/08/2008 1:19:51 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: buccaneer81
COMUNISM, COMMUNISM! COMMUNISM!
99
posted on
07/08/2008 5:21:15 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
To: buccaneer81
"Dukakis calls for end to Electoral College" I am still continually amazed that there are no more honorable Democrats anymore.
They will do anything to win electoral office. Even tear up underlying principles of our nation. If they could get away with it, and it would get them into the White House and hold onto the Congress, I can envision them advocating one-child policies in red states and permits to have children if you're a Christian.
Sheesh.
100
posted on
07/10/2008 9:06:01 AM PDT
by
tom h
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson