“Some people happen to be homosexual.”
That is the fault in your premise. They don’t just happen to be homosexual, they chose to be homosexual. If it weren’t a choice, then why does the gay community still fight for the ability to adopt? If their natural state precludes them from procreating, why would they still have a desire to become parents? Which course of action is their nature when they have a natural desire to become parents? Are they denying their nature by participating in activities that make it impossible to procreate or are they denying their nature when they want to parent?
I did not say it was a choice or not. I was not addressing that. You interpreted it that way. Some people happen to be Catholic. That’s a choice to. You’re nitpiking because you can’t win on substance.