Pat Buchanan is not “archconservative”. He is an antisemitic Nazi-sympathizing dhimmi.
“My only beef with World War II is it caused the Imperialist countries to be inundated with Muslim refugees who are offended both by the freedoms Europeans have and mention of the Holocaust.”
So what’s the answer, Ole Blog Pimper?
Goebbels must be alive and well from his grave. Obama is now going to give his Denver acceptance speech from the 75,000 seat Mile High Stadium. Will we have torch light marchers on the stadium floor? I don’t think the music will be Deutschland Uber Alles, but I am sure they will get Springstring et. al. to work the audience to a lather. Nurenburg II.
This is precisely the kind of error that Buchanan and his ilk like to exploit.
Here's a question - why is Buchanan so upset over the UK's loss of its empire when he is a dyed-in-the-wool isolationist?
Why is he not lauding the UK for disentangling itself from its overseas adventures and proudly congratulating the Little England movement for this great achievement?
I’ll reserve judgment on Pat Buchanan’s latest literary work until he releases the audio book version in the original German.
Buchanan is a lot more likely to be correct than you.
I say this having read Buchanan’s calmly reasoned book and then gotten a short ways into your hysterical essay where you call his work “excrement”. Reading after that wasn’t worth my time.