Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
Exactly. The Court made it clear that a ban of commonly used firearms is unconstitutional.

Fenty and his liberal goons don't care that they are violating the law here. They just want to enact a "law" and let someone file suit. The "law" would be upheld by a good liberal judge awaiting trial. The trial would be put on hold for about a year. First judgment would be against the city/district. An appeal would be filed by Fenty's AG and a some liberal judge would uphold the law again awaiting a trial in a appeal. This goes on and on up to the Supremes again and Fenty is hoping Obama has appointed enough liberal justices that his "law" will be upheld!

27 posted on 07/07/2008 10:53:02 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: TexasRedeye

Actually, given how obviously unconstitutional this would be, I would guess it would be prevented from going into affect either at the trial or appellate level.


34 posted on 07/07/2008 10:59:20 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson