[liberallarry]

I do believe in the law. Absolutely. But I also believe in being realistic...and in seeing through pretense.

The moment he declared his candidacy he should have been investigated...and I’m sure he was. In my mind that time is over. Passed. The Statute of Limitations has expired.

He’s now a legitimate candidate, at least on those grounds.

[mkjessup]

I do believe in the law. Absolutely. But I also believe in being realistic...and in seeing through pretense.

The law is the law pal. Don't try and parse it.

The moment he declared his candidacy he should have been investigated...and I’m sure he was. In my mind

THERE is your problem. "In your mind" does NOT meet the test of the Law.

that time is over. Passed. The Statute of Limitations has expired.

You bloody idiot, there is no 'statute of limitations' on the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency! WTF is wrong with you?

He’s now a legitimate candidate, at least on those grounds.

Not until it is proven to the satisfaction of the Constitution.

[Red Steel]

The moment he declared his candidacy he should have been investigated...and I’m sure he was. In my mind that time is over. Passed. The Statute of Limitations has expired.

Dems vett presidential candidates? LOL! Where have you been? The Dems do not let facts get in the way or the law if they can get around it.

He’s now a legitimate candidate, at least on those grounds.

So anyone can be president of the United States. The Dims can pick anyone as long as he can fool the American voting public.

[Mamzelle]

re: The moment he declared his candidacy he should have been investigated...and I’m sure he was. In my mind that time is over. Passed. The Statute of Limitations has expired.)))

You certainly assume a lot of efficiency on the part of the Democrat party.

[keats5]

Do you really mean all this stuff, or are you just trying to caricature liberals in general?

[keats5]

Do you really mean all this stuff, or are you just trying to caricature liberals in general?