Certainly. I could think of several things that would destroy evolution. If you were to find a fossil of a homo sapien in with Brontosaurus, for example. Of if you found a fossile of a modern horse that is millions of years old. Both would refute evolution as we know it.
so why doesn’t the outcome of an experiment consistent with Lamarckian transmission of acquired characteristics ,and not conistent with Darwinian theory ,falsify Darwinism as the comprehensive explanation you purport it is?
just checking