Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121

“n my training at Cook Co HOspital, we had several infants born, in the early second trimester of extremely low body wt. who were, at the time, way to small to transfer to the neonatal unit.”

I am making the assumption that most of the survivors are genuine preemies.
I think it was in the past month I read that most of these “survivors” are undergoing induced labor on premature infants. I’m not sure if the abortionists are trying to stop their hearts in the womb, or kill them using some other method, but they survive and then are left to die.
Will try to remember where I read that (sleep deprived - brain not working)

I am also assuming that for full term infants - that is when they are resorting to dilation and extraction.
Essentially - making damn sure the baby is dead before he/she emerges.

“I’m asking Obama Camp to explain to me, how is a baby born almost to term, who was an attempted but failed abortion, killed? At what point do the MDS and nurses standing around say, “hey! this one is still alive...What do we do?”

Well, sometimes, this is what they do...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2035631/posts


53 posted on 07/04/2008 6:50:12 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Scotswife
I'm sure you've seen this. If not, please read and pass it on. It might not be a bad idea to post it again on today the 4th of July.

I survived an abortion

Yes, that's what usually happens. A baby farther along than expected is aborted using one of the techniques you mentioned and lives.

I am not an ultra fanatic with regarding my Pro Life beliefs, i.e. I would not kill or bomb an abortion clinic, or defend the person who does this. I don't shout down my colleagues who perform abortions, but they are not my friends.

But something bothers me about telling a young would be mother to adopt out her baby without her getting something in return. I don't know if this is against the law, I'm sure it's not, but I am for young mothers who opt to adopt getting paid, and paid well if they put the child up for adoption.

Why shouldn't a 16 year old girl, who chooses to have the baby, but who is clearly unable to care for it, not have the option of adopting the child out to another loving couple who is WILLING TO PAY THE WOMAN FOR ENDURING HER 9 MONTH PREGNANCY. I MEAN CARRYING A CHILD WOULD BE SIMILAR TO HER BEING EMPLOYED.

After birth the mother gives up the child, receives $100,000, and everyone is happy. The young girl learns from the experience and has the option of doing something positive with her life.

Why would anyone wish to give up their baby otherwise, unless child rearing appalls her?

It bothers me that Obama has more concern for animal rights, than human rights. If this guy is elected, Heaven help us. If late term abortion on demand is NOT wrong...THEN NOTHING IN THIS WORLD IS WRONG.

54 posted on 07/04/2008 8:26:30 AM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president of the US should be a Jackie Robinson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson