It doesn’t take an investigative journalist to know that Obama’s repeated statement that he has “never” been a Muslim is a FLAT OUT LIE.
First, his father was a Muslim, which automatically makes his child a Muslim in Muslim eyes.
Second, his stepfather was a Muslim, and that, too, would have automatically made him a Muslim if he wasn’t already.
Third, he was registered as a Muslim in his Catholic school in Indonesia. (It was NOT a Madrassah, and no one who has looked into it says that it was.)
Fourth, he studied the Quran for year while in school.
Fifth, he attended service in mosques in Indonesia.
Sixth, he told a reporter that he loved the sound of the Muslim prayer, and proceeded to recite it.
We don’t know when, or for that matter, if, he ceased to be a Muslim. But he most certainly was a Muslim in his early days. And although Muslims hate apostates, and issue fatwas calling for their deaths when the learn about them, Muslims everywhere are suspiciously fond of Obama. His all-Muslim relatives in Kenya welcomed him and dressed him up as a Muslim. And no one has issued a fatwa, the way they did against Salman Rushdie and any other public apostates I have ever heard about.
In other words, Obama is a liar, and the Washington Post is complicit in his lies.
The press plays it off that we are xenophobic and intolerant for suspecting that Obama may have been a muslim.
It isn’t that he may have been a muslim (not by choice), it is that he vigorously denies it despite a lot of evidence to the contrary.
And his claims at Christianity are baseless. He has no facts to back it up until he attends Pastor Wright’s church for 20 years and we aren’t supposed to talk about their version of Christianity.
But Mitt Romney’s Mormonism was made a factor in the election by the press. Harry Reid’s Mormonism has never been a factor. Never saw a poll asking how many Americans thought he would be unfit to ascend to the presidency because he is a Mormon.