Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
The AMERICAN "historical tradition" of Privateering: So what does actual HISTORY say? Well, since a Man-of-war was the greatest weapon available at the time -- the weapon of mass destruction of its time -- therefore the US Constitution and 2nd both mean we have the right to surface to air missiles. Even nukes! That's the ORIGINALIST reading.

Of course some like to peek through history's looking glass only through a dim slender hairs-width of a slit. The whole picture is very scary. So we redefine words, change meanings -- make the Constitution "alive" like some Frankenstein's monster, rather than have it be the fearsome contract for Liberty that it was to have been.

885 posted on 06/26/2008 12:27:38 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies ]


To: All
Re the phrase "to bear arms", Justice Scalia's own opinion includes the parenthetic comment:
That is how, for example, our Declaration of Independence used the phrase: “He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country . . . ."
Meaning ... the captives pressed into Royal Navy service operated Men of War -- battleships and the biggest cannon, grenades, mortars, torpedoes, rockets and missiles, etc. Thus "to bear Arms" includes the ownership and operation of the biggest of weapons.

Surface to air missiles, and so on.

Not just stuff a soldier can carry in his arms, or on his body.

Thanks, Mr. Scalia!

954 posted on 06/26/2008 4:44:56 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson