To: kevkrom
we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontationThat is freakin' awesome!
The whole country just became must issue CCL!
To: green iguana
I don’t think so. Heller spoke to the ownership of a firearm “in the home”...there’s nothing in there about concealed carry at all. I expect that this will have little to no practical effect on restrictive CCW laws. I see where you might be able to say that “possess and carry” can be extended into shall-issue CCW—I sure would—but I seriously doubt other courts are going to see it that way.
But what do I know. I’m not a lawyer, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
}:-)4
548 posted on
06/26/2008 7:53:33 AM PDT by
Moose4
(http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
To: green iguana
Reminds me of Colorado’s MAKE MY DAY law.
Check it out! It’s awesome!
569 posted on
06/26/2008 7:57:27 AM PDT by
Carley
To: green iguana
I’ll say this though—that opinion is a judicial b!tchslap of the first order. Scalia absolutely gave Stevens the pimp hand all the way through it.
}:-)4
570 posted on
06/26/2008 7:57:28 AM PDT by
Moose4
(http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
To: green iguana
we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation That is freakin' awesome! The whole country just became must issue CCL! Not exactly but I suspect it will eventually also become a SCOTUS case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson