To: wagglebee
I’m no legal eagle (and didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night) so I’m sure I get it, but did they make this a narrow decision, or is this an out and out win with wide application?
285 posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:20 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
It sounds like an out and out win.
302 posted on
06/26/2008 7:20:08 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: mewzilla
Fox said it went further than even the Bush Administration was hoping.
313 posted on
06/26/2008 7:20:53 AM PDT by
mathluv
To: mewzilla
I’ll let you know when I read it.
To: mewzilla
...
not sure I get it....
Is this a wide ranging ruling?
321 posted on
06/26/2008 7:21:38 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion for the majority stressed that the Court was not casting doubt on long-standing bans on gun possession by felons or the mentally retarded, or laws barring guns from schools or government buildings, or laws putting conditions on gun sales.
322 posted on
06/26/2008 7:21:46 AM PDT by
fzx12345
(ZOTTO ERGO SUM)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson