Skip to comments.
*LIVE THREAD* DC vs Heller decision due at 10:00 EST (2nd Amendment)
SCOTUS Blog ^
| 6-26-08
| shameless vanity
Posted on 06/26/2008 3:55:39 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
To: bvw
Only one majority opinion, no separate concurring opinions. Two dissents. No ambiguity with only one majority opinion.
281
posted on
06/26/2008 7:17:49 AM PDT
by
xjcsa
(Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
To: Blood of Tyrants
A whole lot of DC FReepers cheering outside the Supreme Court I bet.
282
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:04 AM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
To: xjcsa
Good news that freedom has won in this case.
Bad news that it was so close. When is Stevens or Ginsburg gonna keel over, anyway?
283
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:08 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
To: RKBA Democrat
284
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:14 AM PDT
by
10Ring
To: wagglebee
I’m no legal eagle (and didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night) so I’m sure I get it, but did they make this a narrow decision, or is this an out and out win with wide application?
285
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:20 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: beltfed308
5-4.
Also: The 2nd protects the right of the individual to own and keep guns for self-defense. WOO-HOO!
To: Blood of Tyrants
Good news, for now... but the devil's in the details. An hour or two for us to read the decision and we'll know where we stand.
Souter is such a tool.
287
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:25 AM PDT
by
manapua
To: EDINVA
The 2nd amendment is clear...the fact that we need to affirm it, disgusts me. The SC has done enough damage by protecting child rapists and terrorists....not a good time for Amerika.
To: All
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!
We are still citizens and not subjects!! Yuengling toasts tonight in honor or our forefathers!!!
289
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:37 AM PDT
by
4yearlurker
("Give them Watts boys!!")
To: IMissPresidentReagan
5-4. Apparently the liberals all think there’s a right to choose abortion, but not a right to choose a suitable means of self-defense. (Notwithstanding the fact the right to the former has been read into the Constitution, and the right to the latter is stated explicitly.)
290
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:39 AM PDT
by
coloradan
(The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Great News, but let’s wait to see if there are any devils in the details.
291
posted on
06/26/2008 7:18:39 AM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
To: xjcsa
Tom Goldstein - Apologies - there is a second dissenting opinion, but only one majority - no plurality and no concurrences.
To: StoneWall Brigade
5-4. Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsberg dissenting. Two dissenting opinions. Majority opinion still to come. Written by Scalia, which I hope is good news for us.
293
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:03 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: IMissPresidentReagan
10:14 Tom Goldstein - It is striking that the decision is not clouded by ambiguity created by separate opinions. One opinion on each side.
10:16 Tom Goldstein - Apologies - there is a second dissenting opinion, but only one majority - no plurality and no concurrences.
294
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:03 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: NY.SS-Bar9
WAAA-HOOO!! Daddy’s stripping down all of his fire arms and cleaning ‘em! Shouting, “BE PREPARED, BOYS!”
295
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:13 AM PDT
by
A. Morgan
(VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
To: StoneWall Brigade
Whew!!! I just started breathing again!!!
(A 1/29 nod to the poster)
296
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:16 AM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
To: Publius Valerius
Want a reason to vote for McCain? 5-4 is reason enough for me. Our only hope (not certainty) to keep 5-4 or expand it is McCain. We can’t give the socialists the opportunity to add to their scum on the court.
297
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:35 AM PDT
by
big'ol_freeper
("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
To: TonyInOhio
This is why I'm voting for McCain. Imagine the type of person Barry would nominate to join the Leftist Four on the Court!K Amen, bro.
298
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:38 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
To: IMissPresidentReagan
Excellent! AFFIRMED an INDIVIDUALS RIGHT!
299
posted on
06/26/2008 7:19:41 AM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: beltfed308
I don’t recall his name right now but they guy who paid for this case needs to be thanked. He should never have to buy a steak for the rest of his life.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson