Posted on 06/20/2008 8:04:06 AM PDT by mikebeam
Don’t ask. Don’t tell.
Done! The lines are pretty busy...... :)
When I got my non-resident Florida permit, they accepted my military service in lieu of any other “training”.
And I got credit for being a retired LEO, and for my military service.
The point is there is a requirement in Florida for training.
Joe said ... " ... My home state of Florida, for example, doesn't make the training mandatory, so it may or may not end up on the list. "
The facts are that Florida does have a requirement for weapons training to obtain a CCW.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
You shouldn't be; it doesn't apply to you. Only states whose permits require training get reciprocity with SC. And you have to be a resident of a state to get the reciprocity in SC, so a nonresident permit from, say, Florida or Utah doesn't help you either.
It will unfortunately be a while, if ever, before Georgians can carry legally in SC without owning property there.
Why not be happy? It is a step in the right direction. I’m happy whenever any gun restrictions are lifted. besides this on doesn’t affect me, I never go to South Carlolina :)
Utah runs a background check on permit holders daily! LOL. We require training. Maybe I'll have to go visit the Palmetto state after all... maybe a Nascar vacation :o)
Here, can you carry in a bank, or any open-to-the-public business (i.e. bar, mall, etc.) or any public school... just not jails, courts, churches who go on the record or post signs, or fed proscribed areas. We probably shouldn't advertise, but Utah's laws are likely only second to Vermont and Alaska.
Oh, we're a cheap date, too. Permits to out of staters has gotten to be an area of concern, due to the heavy load it puts on BCI to process them. I have no idea if the rates will increase, or the non-resident permits will decrease. Should be an interesting next session.
Last year's attempt to carry hot in your vehicle without a permit barely failed... we'll go after it again this year. We did extend the castle doctrine to occupied cars in a different manner in that lethal force is acceptable in defense of an attempt at carjacking. Texas still wins, hands down, on the legality of using lethal force to protect property. I don't think that's gonna happen here any time soon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.