[smedley64]

lmao. David Brooks seems to be confusing Obama's "brilliance" with the fact that 99% of his fellow idiots in the MSM are refusing to call Obama on any of his many, many contradictions. If they bothered to do their jobs, he wouldn't be looking so "brilliant" to the very people who seem to admire his audacity, like this writer.

Brooks does a good job of pointing out what a disingenous politician Obama is, but then forgives him because, wth, that same type of "Chicago politician machinery" is going to cause Putin to quake in his boots. Riiiiiiiight.

Obama appears "brilliant" to Mr. Brooks because the MSM propaganda machine, of which he is a part, is backing him to the hilt and refusing to point out that he lies continuously. Get a grip, Mr. Brooks.

The guy can't even decide whether to admire Obama for his slickness, or despise him for it, or so it would seem. Since it's from the NYTimes, I'll take it to be a failed stab at "objectivity" regarding Mr. Obama, for true objectivity would not admire deciet, which is what Mr. Brooks ends up doing, but would condemn it. I guess that would be too much to expect from a hack at the NYTimes.

[Coldwater Creek]

CNN ,actually called Obama a promise breaker yesterday, on his now not taking public funds.