Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter
Bring it on.
Heller is the line in the sand for many.

The real question in Heller is: will the gov't cooperate with the rules? If not, neither will others ... with grave consequences.

8 posted on 06/16/2008 10:28:45 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Thank you.It is my line in the sand issue-more so than immigration,abortion,economy,or anything else.Disarming a population is the first concrete step in its subjugation.
I believe that with about 80 million gun owners in the US,that if the one-worlders in SCOTUS prevail,there will be trouble they never imagined.If only 10% resisted confiscation-think about it-8 million people deciding not to go down without a fight.The police couldn’t do it.They would need the armed forces.Would they follow those orders?My feeling is that many if not most enlisted personnel would not turn on their own people.We aren’t talking about Iraqi insurgents here,but the friends and families of those soldiers.
Right now,I think it will be a 7-2 or 6-3 decision in favor of individual rights,so hopefully my thoghts on consequences will be moot.
It’s a good thing this is being decided now,in case Obama gets in,because he will pick the worst imaginable people for th Supreme Court.I can foresee Charles Ogletree of Harvard,Obama’s law alma mater for one.He is one of the promoters of the reparations scam.Or Stephen Reinhardt of the 9th Circuit,an America-hating scumbag communist married to an ACLU bitch.(Ramona Ripston)Just a few happy thoughts about an Obamanation.


42 posted on 06/16/2008 6:14:18 PM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson