The right to arm

The Washington Times ^ | June 16, 2008 | Staff editorial

[yorkie01]

There are too many of us bitter typical white persons who will not give up our guns under any circumstances (Charlton Heston). The 35% figure is bogus since many guns are not registered nor were they ever required to be. Also, how many gang bangers and criminals register their guns?

[steamroller]

Thank you.It is my line in the sand issue-more so than immigration,abortion,economy,or anything else.Disarming a population is the first concrete step in its subjugation.
I believe that with about 80 million gun owners in the US,that if the one-worlders in SCOTUS prevail,there will be trouble they never imagined.If only 10% resisted confiscation-think about it-8 million people deciding not to go down without a fight.The police couldn’t do it.They would need the armed forces.Would they follow those orders?My feeling is that many if not most enlisted personnel would not turn on their own people.We aren’t talking about Iraqi insurgents here,but the friends and families of those soldiers.
Right now,I think it will be a 7-2 or 6-3 decision in favor of individual rights,so hopefully my thoghts on consequences will be moot.
It’s a good thing this is being decided now,in case Obama gets in,because he will pick the worst imaginable people for th Supreme Court.I can foresee Charles Ogletree of Harvard,Obama’s law alma mater for one.He is one of the promoters of the reparations scam.Or Stephen Reinhardt of the 9th Circuit,an America-hating scumbag communist married to an ACLU bitch.(Ramona Ripston)Just a few happy thoughts about an Obamanation.