Posted on 06/12/2008 12:30:50 PM PDT by pissant
Same here.
The last copy I ordered of mine looked just like this one posted on Kos.
The “original” my parents had years ago, was inversed (white type on a black background)
I was born in 62, so I imagine that’s just how documents are handled now.
African is not a race that and the pfony document says in the bottom corner is is laser printed and the lettering is not inconstant with Laser printing, it appears to be photoshopped .
I smell a forgery, is that legal????
“His mother was a US citizen and therefore so is he.”
Dangit, THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE. The issue is “Does he qualify as a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AS THAT TERM WAS DEFINED WHEN HE WAS BORN.” Different standard, at least then. The reasoning behind the law was because one parent wasn’t a US citizen and the other hadn’t been for 5 years, he was just as much a citizen of both countries and could choose at majority. (They didn’t allow dual citizenship as much then.) Therefore, he qualifies as a NATURALIZED citizen, not a NATURAL BORN citizen. The ONLY real difference between the two is one is eligible for President, the other is NOT.
I’d cite the statute, but it’s been cited time and again already, and apparently people aren’t bothering to read it. They prefer what they “know” vs. what the specific applicable statute said at the time.
Why is this so d@mn hard for people to grasp?!?!!! Unfreakingbelievable.
Obamall?? Oba mall?? Obam all???
Must be a typo.
I see jpeg compression artifacts
It is laser printed, apparently that is how they issue them these days. But save to your computer and zoom around the typing. Notice the missing background markings.
The statute does not apply if he was born in the United States, only if he was born in Kenya or another country. This document, if legit, shows that Obama was born in Hawaii, which was then and is today part of the U.S., thus he is a natural born citizen.
Looks like a cut and paste job, but I'm far from the expert.
Even if it is a fake, which I would not be surprised at all, since the source is the Daily Kos
Just how are you going to prove it a fake?
Since we’re rolling bones, his maternal grandparents moved to Hawaii to be with their flake of a daughter, so another possiblity is they adopted the kid—since mom was just a kid herself and papa `flew the coop’—and American-ized his name in the adoption petition/Decree.
Ten, twenty years later Barry decides he’ll have better luck in the brave new `Great Society’ going with the old man’s handle.
All idle speculation since, as you point out, all of this would be sealed.
Stanley Ann Dunham:
Just another 60’s round-heeled, campus rebelette, white girl in love with the idea of thumbing her nose at society by bedding down with a black man without formalities or consideration of the results.
In this case the result was a mixed race child born out of wedlock, abandoned by his black father and handed off to his white relatives to raise while his mother persued other romantic interests.
He has now grown into a bitter racist who openly despises his white heritage.
Freud would have a field day with this lash-up.
Look at the zoomed ‘certificate number’ text and comapre to the zoomed Obama’s name.
Why is this so d@mn hard for people to grasp?!?!!! Unfreakingbelievable.
Ummmmm, before you rant too much (more), you might want to re-read the statute. It will show the law you're fond of citing & interpreting in no way applies to Obama.
This is a D-E-A-D issue.
Can't we move on to something with more legs, like how Obama looks when riding a bike? (/sarc)
Where did you come up with that cockamamie idea?
Granted "II" is a bit more pretentious than "Jr" but in no way does it indicate illegitimacy.
That's the emerging consensus on HotAir right now. Plus the source of the Certification of Live Birth is DailyKos ... Since Obama’s campaign just launched a Fight the Smears website for just this sort of thing, why wasn't it released there first?
A lot of forms are done like that. Instead of a line to put the information, they have a clear space in the background. It makes copies clearer when there's no clutter behind the text.
And, if you took the core issue to this SCOTUS, how do you suppose they would rule...???
I doubt they'd even hear the case.
“How do we know Obama’s mother met this standard?”
Wow, someone who actually looked at how “natural born citzen” was defined under the law. What are you doing slumming in FR where apparently the actual statute is trumped by what people “know”?
BTW, his mom was 18 when he was born, so she cannot have met the standard. Therefore, Obama is a US citizen, but NOT a “natural born” US citizen. That makes him ineligible to be President under the Constitution. But nobody seems to care. I mean who gives a sh#t about the actual laws and Constitution in moderm dumbed down America? Certainly most freepers don’t, or these concepts are just too complex for them to grasp (scary thought).
According to Miss Manners, 2nd indicates that the child is named after an older relative who is not his father. I expect Obama’s parents just made a mistake, natural enough since his father was not American.
Much as I’d like this exposed as fake, I think you are right. You get those artifacts at hard edges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.