If you'd done some homework, you'd known we ran not one, but two stories, questioning the credentials of the polygraph "expert" who conducted the test. The list of stories from that time which questioned the test is a small one. We did two.
DBKP was also the first to debunk the fake WashPo editorial that the Obamaniacs circulated via email trying to discredit Sinclair--back before he discredited himself.
Larry has a signed affidavit that he talked to the CPD--not that he provided any proof to them--which he didn't.
Scornful? It's hard not to be. Of the 23 Sinclair stories, the first 11 (maybe 12) were pro-Sinclair, 1 neutral and the last 10, scornful.
Strangely silent? We held out hope for ten long weeks waiting for any shred of proof. The hotel receipts prove that he had a room in Gurnee, IL and checked out on the morning of (at least one of) the nights he supposedly had Obama back to his room. Obama was in Chicago: in the Senate on one of Larry's days, and speaking at a symposium the other.
Larry's offered up the limo driver?!? Really, do a bit of checking: you'll backtrack on this as fast as Larry has. Now, he says that the limo driver is a friend of Obama's. This is the Third different excuse about why he can't produce a limo driver who'll corroborate his story.
Our attitude is this: it could've happened, but the likelihood is fast approaching 0%. And no one has debunked Larry more than Larry.
I NEVER thought I'd be in the position of defending B.H. Obama--and on FR! You read the stories, watch the videos, follow the links: if you're then still convinced about Larry going anywhere but back behind bars, perhaps a donation to one of Sinclair's many "funds" would be in order. Maybe you'll get to buy Larry his next $1400 escort.
I realize that not everyone has spent, literally, 100s of hours reading, on the phone (on hold a lot) and talking with people who've known Larry, done "business" with him or to check out his many, many claims. For weeks, we spent hours and hours trying to dig up stuff to HELP Larry Sinclair. If you can find any hard evidence for the guy, you're better than we are at the moment.
That all being said, thanks for taking the time to post your thought-provoking comments. Answering challenging commenters will keep us on your toes!
Well, you certainly have repeated some of the talking points of the leftwing blogs, so allow me to educate you on the situation.
Nothing, and I mean nothing, that the hundreds of obamunists have written has refuted Larry’s basic story. Not his criminal record, not his medical history, not his supposed failure of a questionable polygraph.
Larry stated months ago that he will reveal the limo driver’s name to a major media outlet, but would not put it on the blogs. Larry repeated his promise to do just that again about three weeks ago, on his blog, if any media outlets would be willing to talk to him. So far, crickets from the MSM. He has ALWAYS stated that the driver knew Obama, from day 1.
He has always stated and produced receipts that he extended his stay in Chicago, beyond his original checkout night.
Your story about the Chicago PD is incorrect as well. He has stated multiple times that he has given his old phone numbers to the CPD so they could corroborate or at least investigate his claims that Donald Young called him. CPD is in possession of his old phone number at the time.
As you know, the Sympsoium speech was an early evening affair, and in no way refutes anything Larry has said. He never said they were constant companions for a day.
If you make these generic claims of self refutation on Larry’s part (like all the Obamunists do) you might want to line up some quotes. Because from every thing I have read since late january, he has been exceedingly consistent, unlike his critics, who repeat each others fanciful talking points.