Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
We have covered Sinclair extensively. The first five or six of our Sinclair stories were more than fair to him. Library of DBKP Larry Sinclair, Obama's Accuser, Stories Five months on, we're still waiting for any proof from this goof. As we said a couple weeks ago: Larry's offered plenty of fund-raisers and pleas for money, but still no proof. And that's all the fairness we're going to give this still-wanted felon (who's on one Most-Wanted list) and who insists on posting a picture of himself from his 20's as what he looked like at the time of his alleged meeting with Obama. We've exchanged several emails with Sinclair and basically are saying what we asked for 4 months ago: ANY evidence to back up his claims. We're still waiting. We have no love for Obama, but spending the time on Obama and his loony positions is more valuable than spending it on helping a two-bit conman. Thanks for your comment, though.
16 posted on 06/12/2008 3:07:32 PM PDT by mondoreb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: mondoreb

Yes, you have covered him ‘extensively’, but not very well. You do not have links to any of his extensive public interviews. You have taken the time to ‘fisk’ what Larry has said and ask such scorning questions as ‘why would a sitting Senator buy coke..’. You have made much hay out of Larry’s past criminality.

You play up his ‘failing’ the polygraph, yet never seem interested in how the other 3 hours and 58 minutes of the recorded polygraph test went. Only a shady test giver’s summation of two questions. Is it possible they asked Larry many questions about the alleged incident? Does it seem strange that the video of that test, which was supposed to be released in its entirety has never been seen?

You mock Larry (deservedly so) for his rambling Minnesota Lawsuit filed which got thrown out, but you seem strangely silent on the fact that Larry has a signed affidavit to the CPD regarding calls from one Donald Young, not to mention giving them his phone numbers for tracking. And in that affadavit, he restates the allegations about Obama.

If larry is such a nut job, why have none of the hundreds of anti-Larry bloggers/Obama volunteers demonstrated where Obama was during that time period. That’s right he was in Chicago. And how the heck would Larry know that if he did not meet him?

You may not think hotel receipts and bar tabs are much of a proof of anything, but Larry was clearly in Chicago for the time he said he was. He has offered up the Limo Driver, a witness, to the MSM, but they won’t run with the story. He said long ago he was not going to release the name on his blog so the Obama vultures could go after him.

And seeing how the Koskids are getting their panties in a knot over Larry upcoming press conference, all I can say is Go Larry Go.


21 posted on 06/12/2008 5:48:58 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson