[jazusamo]

I don't think Col. Ewers testified during Lt. Col. Chessani's Article 32.

That's correct. I was referring to him testifying in Capt. Stone's hearing specifically and any other hearing he "might" testify in.

If he was going to testify in any of the hearings I believe it was improper for Gen. Mattis to appoint him his top legal counsel due to the appearance of UCI.

[Girlene]

Jaz, I knew you knew that. :-) I wasn't sure whether Ewers had testified in Lt. Col. Chessani's Article 32. I had to check.

If he was going to testify in any of the hearings I believe it was improper for Gen. Mattis to appoint him his top legal counsel due to the appearance of UCI.

Megadittoes to that statement, jaz. Not only appoint him as top counsel, but invite him to sit in on all those meetings getting Mattis's and other's input before he might testify.