[brityank]

I have to question how, if Folsom does rule that UCI was in fact evident in the prosecutions charge statements, he can allow a ruling “without prejudice” and permit a refiling.

[Girlene]

I have to question how, if Folsom does rule that UCI was in fact evident in the prosecutions charge statements, he can allow a ruling “without prejudice” and permit a refiling.

That's a good question. It will be hard to thread that needle, won't it?

[RedRover]

Agreed a “without prejudice” ruling wouldn’t make much sense. If the well is poisoned, it’ll never be pure. Any new trial, sometime down the road, would have to make use of testimony and materials gathered under a UCI cloud.