Replies

Besides, any evidence would be dismissed as fabrication, and you know it.

Let's see the evidence first, then we can see who dismisses it. As for now, it is a major screw up on the part of our govenrmnent.

I thought Bush knew what he was dong when we went into Iraq. But, of course, I also thought he'd protect our borders too. But, instead he allowed us to be invaded and then tried to bestow citizenship upon the invaders. Maybe you missed that bit of recent history. The man is not trustworthy.

I'll be glad to see Bush go. Too bad there isn't anyone worth a damn about to replace him.

You know what? It does not matter what evidence is produced. The fact that some has already surfaced, like traces of poisons in the Tigris, and been thoroughly ignored should be proof enough that nothing will ever satisfy the international community that did not want Saddam deposed because he was a nominal Socialist who sold black market oil to those complaining the loudest about Bush. I see no point whatsover in wasting our time trying to convince crooks and hypocrites that we did the right thing.

I agree with your statement about the borders, but I was never arguing that Bush was perfect, only that there was evidence enough of WMD to justify what we did to anyone who is reasonable. As for the unreasonable, to the devil with them.