To: mysterio
I don't think we can afford to exist purely on oil long term. It's time to start thinking about what comes next and to start working towards it. We should have started in 1975.Nuclear plants would be one thing. Another would be realistic alternative energy - not ethanol and probably not hydrogen either.
16 posted on
06/06/2008 7:25:29 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(Obama '08 - Because Jimmy Carter Didn't Screw Things Up Enough)
To: RockinRight
Butanol before ethanol, and biodiesel before either of them, in my opinion. I think hydrogen could be made viable, though. Remember, gasoline wasn’t viable when all we had was whale oil.
22 posted on
06/06/2008 7:30:54 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: RockinRight
uclear plants would be one thing. Another would be realistic alternative energy - not ethanol and probably not hydrogen either.
The quickest way to independence is twofold: 1) Nuclear power plants and 2) use the coal that was being burned for electricity to make liquid fuels. This is an old and proven technology that will work.
Of course, the greenies will have none of it.
65 posted on
06/06/2008 9:17:41 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a suggestion)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson